Which one to use depends on the context. Our data, however, put additional constraints on this connectivity model. us essay writing service fast cheap Although this concern has not been thoroughly ruled out, it seems unlikely because, in at least one study, GABAergic interneuorns were loaded just as efficiently as neighboring pyramidal neurons using similar methodology Summarise your key findings if your discussion chapter is separate from the results Discuss how the results relate to the literature review Discuss how this affects your original hypothesis Discuss what this means in practice 2. These findings are consistent with the random connectivity model provided that there is at least one component of the overall connectivity that is strong, sparse and decreases fast with distance.
Specifically, at short distances we observed both very large and very small correlations, while at longer distances we observed only smaller correlations These should be the first two pieces of information the reader encounters. Tonotopy and gradual decrease of signal correlation with distance were found when examining larger distances.
Doctoral thesis discussion college application essay writers knoxville tn 2018
The results indicate that coffee improves productivity. Nature Neuroscience, 13, , DOI: In fact, the precision of tonotopic organization in A1 has been a controversial issue for a few decades and remains unresolved to date 9, 34, 35, 36, Between and , the number of road accidents decreased significantly.
Tips straight to your inbox! Functional organization and population dynamics in the mouse primary auditory cortex. Rather than simply describing your results, think about what they mean.
This model could partially explain our results, including the heterogeneous micro-architecture and the decrease of signal and noise correlations with distance. Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Tips straight to your inbox! The simplest connectivity model to consider would be that of a tonotopic input combined with locally random noisy connectivity. Rather than simply describing your results, think about what they mean.
- dissertation editor key
- phd by dissertation only number of words
- help with english writing lessons youtube
- help with writing a speech examples
- the best essay writers mother in marathi
Buy college essay yourself
Previous reports of smooth tonotopic maps may have resulted from techniques that average the responses over multiple neurons. Although most people include a discussion section in their dissertation or thesis , some end up missing out key issues. can you write my dissertation in 2 weeks Writing Tips by ProofreadMyDocument. The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction.
Consider what any relationships and patterns in your findings imply. Refer to the Hypothesis and Literature Review Referring to previous parts of your paper gives the discussion context. nyu dissertation guidelines These neurons might be involved in something other than simple pure-tone coding, such as processing of complex sound features
The Discussion section is sort of an odd beast because it is here where you speculate, but must avoid rambling, guessing, or making logical leaps beyond what is reasonably supported for your data. Although most people include a discussion section in their dissertation or thesis , some end up missing out key issues. writing services company inc complaints So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's knowledge has been changed by the addition of this new data. However, when summarising results or describing a process that has concluded, the past tense should be used:. As tempting as it may be, avoid over-using the grammatical first person.
Romeo and juliet essay help juliet
The same applies to your hypothesis: Notably, a subnetworks model would account for the details of the dependence of signal correlation and noise correlation on distance. Our main finding consists of highly heterogeneous local populations with relatively large correlations between a minority of neighboring neurons. Are there any obvious organizational principles in local populations?
Although this concern has not been thoroughly ruled out, it seems unlikely because, in at least one study, GABAergic interneuorns were loaded just as efficiently as neighboring pyramidal neurons using similar methodology Such a model would result in the formation of small subnetworks of highly correlated neurons , partially overlapping in space. State the major conclusions from your study and present the theoretical and practical implications of your study.
Which one to use depends on the context. The same applies to your hypothesis: Use subheadings if it makes sense; otherwise, worry less about "flow" between sections than you should in the introduction. Are there any obvious organizational principles in local populations?